Whiplash

Welcome to another episode of Lights....Camera....Popcorn!

Today's review is Whiplash.

Written & Directed by Damien Chazelle.

Review #262

MPAA Rating: Rated R for strong language including some sexual references.

Run Time: 107 min

Hulk Spoils Hollywood Podcast Page

Cast

Miles Teller...Andrew

J.K. Simmons...Fletcher

Paul Reiser...Jim

Melissa Benoist...Nicole

Austin Stowell...Ryan

Nate Lang...Carl


"There are no two words in the English language more harmful than good job."

These were the words of Terence Fletcher played by the utterly brilliant J.K. Simmons in the equally brilliant film Whiplash. Now I do not agree with that statement at all. I'll get deeper into why later in this review. The one thing I did take away from this amazing film is the time tested debate of what it takes for someone to be great at something and how far should someone go when "guiding" that person toward said goal.

Whiplash not only creates that debate.

It stakes it's claim as one of the BEST FILMS OF THE YEAR!
Plot

A promising young drummer enrolls at a cutthroat music conservatory where his dreams of greatness are mentored by an instructor who will stop at nothing to realize a student's potential.

I love this time of year. I prefer the holiday film season more than the summer. As a geek it may be against the code to utter those words but it's a fact. The reason is simple. Summer season films are predictable. You get the comic book blockbusters, CGI animated features and the franchise sequels. The holiday season gives you the "turn your brain on" films. The ones that don't require 3D glasses but do require your thinking cap.

Whiplash is one of those films and it's a MASTERPIECE!
I'll begin with the best part of this film and that's J.K. Simmons. If you don't know who he is then you must be living in the alternate universe Christopher Nolan created in Interstellar because this man is one of the GREATEST character actors EVER! You've seen him on TV in those Farmer's Insurance commercials. He's played J. Jonah Jameson in Sam Raimi's Spiderman trilogy. However, he's best known for playing Vern Schillinger in HBO's prison drama OZ. He played the embodiment of evil on that show and the case can be made that Terence Fletcher is scarier.
The film kicks off with a great scene depicting the kind of character Simmons is playing. He's not only feared by his students but by the teachers as well and it's that kind of "villain" that makes a film so much more enjoyable. That being said the fear Fletcher inspires over everyone at the school is not only because of his intimidating nature. He holds the fate of the band's future in his hands. They all know with the snap of his fingers Fletcher can crush their dreams of becoming anything. The class strolls in yapping away but the second the clock strikes 9 they all stand at attention in complete silence the moment he walks into the room. The militaristic precision the students show instantly inform us that this man is never to be fu**ed with. However his beastly behavior never detracts from his musical prowess.

This is best shown in the scene pictured here.
During a session he stops the band because he hears someone playing out of tune. Before he gets into rage mode he gives the student a chance to come forward. After no one does he weeds out the individual sections of the band to find out who it is. After discovering the section he badgers the kid in the white shirt until he finally confesses that he was playing out of tune. Fletcher then erupts and kicks him off the band. The scene could have ended there and we would have gotten all we needed to know about Fletcher but then he caps it off by revealing that it was someone else that was out of tune but the fact that he kid he yelled at didn't know that he wasn't was worse.

Brilliant play of showcasing the evil genius that is Terence Fletcher.
Of course there's no villain without someone to bully and that's Miles Teller. The aspiring drummer is mousy and unassuming until Fletcher begins to influence him in ways he never thought possible. As he hides in plain sight as an alternate drummer in Fletcher's band you don't think anything will materialize from it. Then when an opportunity arises, Andrew takes full advantage.

How that opportunity was created is up for debate.
Now as the core drummer for the band Andrew begins to gain self confidence that drives him through the rest of the film. He gets the courage to ask a girl he's had feelings for on a date. He's no longer intimidated by the other band members that flexed their instrumental muscles at him when he first arrived. However, the best example of his attitude swing comes from a scene where he's having a family dinner and while his uncle is bragging about his sons accomplishments, Andrew points out how insignificant they are in the big picture. This causes a sophisticated argument about what's more important. Being popular now or known forever. It was a furiously written scene that was for me capped off brilliantly when one of Andrew's cousin's takes offense when he poo poo's on his college football record because he plays Division III.

His cousin says this.

I got a reply for you, Andrew. You think Carlton football's a joke? Come play with us.

And Andrew's response was....

Four words you will never hear from the NFL.

Bam....Drop the mic and walk off stage.

The scene doesn't end there.

Chazelle brilliantly knocks Andrew off his high horse which is a friendly reminder to us and Andrew that even though he's a "big" man now, everyone remembers that wasn't the case a few months ago and it would behoove Andrew to remember that.
That comes heavily into play when Andrew runs into a shift in the story. Here is where Whiplash gets a little over the top but considering all the stress Fletcher puts on his students it stands to reason that crazy actions will motivate them in times of crisis. When things reach the ultimate blow up point the film takes a breath and gives us a chance to take in what happened.

That is until the films final moment.
The scene pictured above is the final scene of the film which up to this point left me wondering how in the world would this film end. I will not spoil anything about this scene. I will leave you with this opinion. The film ended pitch perfectly. There's so much to dive into the final minutes of Whiplash but you all deserve to witness them yourself. Especially since I spoiled some other moments in this review. I feel a little bad about it but this review would be three sentences had I not divulged a few tidbits.

The bottom line is Whiplash is a GREAT film. A MUST see and one of the best films in 2014 and until something comes to knock it off (which is very likely) My choice for best of the year overall. This movie has Oscar potential on several levels. I just hope it's tiny release doesn't hurt it's chances for the heavy hardware.

On the 5 star scale. Whiplash gets the full house. 5 stars with a "Worth Every Penny!" recommendation.

That's a wrap for today.

Until Next Episode...."I'll Save You A Seat!"

"D"

Interstellar

Welcome to another episode of Lights....Camera....Popcorn!

Today's review is Interstellar.

Directed by Christopher Nolan.

Written by Jonathan Nolan & Christopher Nolan.

Review #261

MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for some intense perilous action and brief strong language.

Run Time: 169 min

Hulk Spoils Hollywood Podcast Page

Cast

In order of apperance

Ellen Burstyn...Murph (older)

Matthew McConaughey...Cooper

Mackenzie Foy...Murph (10 Yrs.)

John Lithgow...Donald

Bill Irwin...TARS (voice)

Anne Hathaway...Brand

Wes Bentley...Doyle

Michael Caine...Professor Brand

David Gyasi...Romilly

Josh Stewart...CASE (voice)

Jessica Chastain...Murph


Topher Grace...Getty

Matt Damon...Dr. Mann


It's no secret that I am on Team Nolan. From the day he played with everyone's head with Memento I knew immediately that this was a man dedicated to making films.

Not movies. There is a difference.

Nolan's talent is only limited by his imagination and judging by his non Batman films, his imagination is limitless. That's not always a good thing and that is the case with this film.

Interstellar is by far Nolan's WORST film.

However, that doesn't mean it's bad.

Plot

A team of explorers travel through a wormhole in an attempt to find a potentially habitable planet that will sustain humanity.

Let me explain what I meant when I said Interstellar is Nolan's worst film. Nolan has such an expansive mind for stories that he can sometimes overload the audience with material that does more harm than good. With this film he knocks you over the head with a TON of science. Not necessarily a bad thing. Unless the science is way beyond the reach of anyone not named Neil deGrasse Tyson.

The basic plot is as straightforward as you can get.

It's when we venture out into space where Interstellar both succeeds and fails.
The "worlds" that the team explores are beautiful in a creepy way. They present the best chance of humanity's survival but don't appear on the "surface" as a livable habitat. The exploration scenes provide the film with the necessary action beats it needs to keep people on board after all the emotions that run through the main cast. At it's core, Interstellar is a save the world film but along the way Nolan does something very risky. He blends two very opposite and opposing forces.

Science vs Faith.
I don't mean faith in the religious sense. Nolan brings the "L" word into the equation. Love plays a immeasurable factor in the weight of this story. It's that inclusion that brings the heart of Interstellar to the forefront. The people on this mission are not just trying to save the world, they are trying to save their loved ones. It's a force more powerful than any weapon a person can wield. It can also cloud a person's judgement forcing bad decisions that affect others. Those dynamics come into play when it concerns our main man Coop and his daughter Murph. Their relationship is strong and when Coop leaves for the mission Murph shuns him. It's a moment that comes into play much later in the film when Coop looks at video messages from his family while out in space.
It's explained that after passing through the wormhole that time is no longer the same for them as it is for the people they left behind. So when Coop looks at an archive of messages he breaks down in total heartache watching the reality that he missed his children growing up. The scene is pictured above is one of the high points of the film. Even though it's depicting a very somber moment it was vital to remind us that these people have made the ultimate sacrifice and seeing the pain behind Coop's eyes was predictable but poignant.
When the film eventually reaches it's third act. At almost three hours it takes a while for that to happen. Interstellar plays another trick on everyone by forcing you to take a side revolving a very compelling argument. This argument creates an interesting dynamic between the characters making and an emotional divide that makes it very hard to choose. Nolan drags this out for all it's worth and cross cuts this with what's going on on a different part of the planet with the remaining astronauts.

It was a well crafted scene that was unfortunately lost under Hans Zimmer's overpowering score.
If I had to complain about a Nolan film, there would be 2 gripes. The first being his sound mixing. It's HORRIBLE. For someone who's as detailed as him it strikes me odd that his last string of films constantly have to fight with itself. Going back to his Dark Knight trilogy to Inception to here, these films have had blatant issues with sound and music. Nolan's dialogue gets garbled under blaring tones that make it impossible to discern. To make matters worse this happens at critical points of the film where story points are mapped out to guide us along. Once is a mistake, twice is noticeable, three or four times is just an unacceptable oversight that 1st year film students know not to do.
The second gripe is actually more important. Nolan had this problem with The Dark Knight Rises and Inception. He over stuffs his films with way too many subplots or overcomplicated scenarios. I can't believe I'm about to write this but he has a tendency to go Damon Lindelof on us. I know It's sacrilege to put Nolan and that wannabe hack in the same group but in this case it's unavoidable. Nolan goes Lindelof here and though he's able to save it at the end by tugging at our tickers it doesn't excuse the incredibly overdone climax that does more questioning that explaining. This is where I realized that this was Nolan's worst film. He couldn't kill his darlings. It's a tough proposition for filmmakers. They fall in love with their material and fight to keep stuff in that makes no sense or drags the story down. Nolan is guilty of that.

Both Nolan's are guilty of that.
His younger brother Jonathan co wrote the script and is the "crazier" of the pair. He loves to go "out" there and explore the deep reaches of the imagination and that exploration yields some "interesting" results. Not that they're bad, they're just uncontrolled. This is where big brother comes in and tries to reign things in. The combination works for the most part. This time it didn't because there was way too much out there to hold down.

Interstellar is not a bad movie. It's very good in some spots and in some spots it's great but there are places where it's not so great or good and that's unfortunately what I gravitated to.

No pun intended.

On the 5 star scale. Interstellar gets 2.5 stars with a "Go See It!" recommendation.

That's a wrap for today.

Until Next Episode...."I'll Save You A Seat!"

"D"

Birdman

Welcome to another episode of Lights....Camera....Popcorn!

Today's review is Birdman.

Directed by Alejandro González Iñárritu.

Written by Alejandro González Iñárritu, Nicolás Giacobone, Alexander Dinelaris & Armando Bo.

Review #260

MPAA Rating: Rated R for language throughout, some sexual content and brief violence.

Run Time: 119 min

Hulk Spoils Hollywood Podcast Page

Cast

Michael Keaton...Riggan

Emma Stone...Sam

Zach Galifianakis...Jake

Naomi Watts...Lesley

Jeremy Shamos...Ralph

Andrea Riseborough...Laura

Edward Norton...Mike


Lindsay Duncan...Tabitha

Meritt Weaver...Annie

Movies can do many things.

They can entertain.

Provide an escape from the harsh realities of life.

Remind us of what really matters to us all.

And finally they can inspire.

The immeasurable power that movies wield is what draws me to them and once in a blue moon a film finds a way to do all of the things I just described.

Ladies and Gentlemen I present to you....Birdman!
Plot

A washed-up actor who once played an iconic superhero must overcome his ego and family trouble as he mounts a Broadway play in a bid to reclaim his past glory.

This movie is so amazing that I don't know where to begin so I will do the obvious thing and start from the beginning.
The film begins with this scene and right at the outset you are trying to ascertain what you're seeing. Can Riggan actually fly? Does he think he can? or is Alejandro González Iñárritu just messing with us.

The answer is YES.

From this point on the film no pun intended takes off.
Going into this film I knew a couple of things like the basic synopsis and how this film was a pseudo commentary on Micheal Keaton's career after he donned the cape and cowl. The one thing I didn't know was how this film was going to play and how it plays was just remarkable and in my opinion the only way it would have worked. I want so badly to tell you what I mean but I refuse to take the surprise away from you.

You all deserve to witness it without any preconceived ideas.

So let's get into what I can talk about and I'll start with the Birdman himself.
I mentioned earlier that this film plays like a commentary about Keaton's career after Batman and a strong argument can be made that it is. After achieving massive success playing the superhero Birdman, Riggan has pigeon holed himself into being known as only Birdman. So Riggan's motivation is to take flight and resurrect his career like a phoenix rising from the ashes in a stage play that he adapts, stars and directs.

Sorry for all the bird puns. I couldn't resist.

As the movie progresses you follow Riggan as he juggles all of the responsibilities a director has and you begin to feel overwhelmed as he is. This guy is under a tremendous amount of pressure and Iñárritu does a wonderful job of letting us feel that pressure as Riggan takes his last shot at career revival.

This is just one of several commentaries this film makes about the entertainment industry that I LOVED with every beat of my heart.
The first one is the reality that no matter how big a star you are, eventually the spotlight will move on to someone else. This isn't exactly what happens to Riggan. He's more concerned with giving the audience another side of himself after "selling out" to play Birdman three times in major motion pictures.

Does this sound familiar? It should.

How many times have we heard about actors playing in major blockbuster films, make a ton of money then go behind it's back and trash it because they are "artists" and believe in the "purity" of the acting craft. No matter how hard he tries, Riggan can't escape the bird's shadow. When he's out on the street he's hounded by fans for autographs. He'll be standing outside his theater with his name and picture on the marquee and the people still call him Birdman. He does press to promote the play and when he mentions that doing the play was one of the reasons why he turned down making Birdman 4 one of the foreign reporters goes nuts asking him if he will do it. This frustrates Riggan to no end and begins to complain about it but is called out by his daughter played by Emma Stone.
This scene was brilliantly written and performed by Stone. She rips her dad down off his high horse while sending a message to all the egotistical Tinseltown turncoats that have no problem taking the check to play super whoever only to turn around and bad mouth everything about the film after it's out. It was refreshing to hear someone give Hollywood a reality check when it comes to the hypocrisy the business is notorious for.

But wait....There's more.
The other commentaries this film makes revolve around one spectacular scene involving Riggan and a New York Times theater critic played by Lindsay Duncan. The fate of the play rests on her review and she makes it plain as day that her review will destroy Riggan's chance of any success. The back and forth between the critic and the performer was remarkable. Both sides made valid points worth considering. It was hard to take a side because when the critic pontificates about the S.O.S method of films today and how everyone spends their time “measuring out your worth in weekends.” You understand where she comes from. The first thing Tabitha says to Riggan is "I'm going to kill your play." Then proceeds to call him a "Hollywood clown in a lycra bird suit." Brutal stuff but Birdman fights back. Riggan responds with the logic of how irresponsible and petty it is for a critic to form an opinion on someone's work without seeing it first.

The scene was amazing and for me one of the highlights of a film that was chock full of them.
Speaking of highlights. It's time to talk about how incredible Michael Keaton is. He turns in an Oscar worthy performance that hasn't been seen from him in ages. He injects so much of his career exploits from past and present into this character that you might have been better off calling him Michael instead of Riggan. Plus the Birdman and Batman DNA is way too tongue in cheek to not ignore.
Keaton does a bit of everything with Riggan. You get the stressed out, under the gun, against the clock aging actor who may have bit off more than he can chew with his play. You get the soulful man with heart and emotions. Then you get the fun Riggan which was the zany, out of his head former super hero who still hears Birdman talking to him.
Keaton doesn't have to steal the show because he is the show but the man pictured to the right gives a valiant effort to clip the Birdman's wings. Edward Norton has had a fall from Hollywood grace after some box office flops and over inflated ego clashes with the powers that be in the biz. To see him comeback and comeback strong was a pleasure to witness. Norton is a really good actor and the material he's given here puts him back on the level he once shared with the elite. A lot of this has to do with Iñárritu's direction and the stunning script but the performance still has to materialize and man does it ever.
This film is an achievement on so many levels that it's gonna get SERIOUS contention for some Hollywood hardware. The only thing that can possibly stop or slow down The Birdman is every film's arch enemy....The calendar. This film might have been better served if it was released around Christmas time when all the other Oscar contenders get released. The other side to that argument is Birdman is ahead of the competition because it came out first. Very valid point but in situations like this I'm reminded of something Charles Barkley once said. "The only person that's undefeated in sports is Father Time." Meaning that the more time passes as more Oscar films come out, will Birdman get lost in the flock? Highly unlikely. I'm just concerned that the power this film carries will be weakened by it coming out in October.

One thing remains clear.

Birdman is a tremendous film that requires your money and attention. A must see!

On the 5 star scale. Birdman gets the full house. 5 stars with a "Worth Every Penny!" recommendation.

That's a wrap for today!

Until Next Episode...."I'll Save You A Seat!"

"D"

Gone Girl

Welcome to another episode of Lights....Camera....Popcorn!

Today's review is Gone Girl.

Directed by David Fincher.

Written by Gillian Flynn.

Based on the novel "Gone Girl" written by Gillian Flynn.

Review #259

MPAA Rating: Rated R for a scene of bloody violence, some strong sexual content/nudity, and language.

Run Time: 149 min

Hulk Spoils Hollywood Podcast Page

Cast

Ben Affleck...Nick Dunne

Rosamund Pike...Amy Dunne

Neil Patrick Harris...Desi Collings

Tyler Perry...Tanner Bolt

Carrie Coon...Margo Dunne

Kim Dickens...Detective Rhonda Boney

Patrick Fugit...Officer Jim Gilpin 


There are directors, film makers and then there are artists. David Fincher is all three.
Say what you want about some of his "lesser" films, I've gone on the record that The Curious Case of Benjamin Button was utterly awful. Having said that, regardless of my or your feelings towards this man's work there is one undeniable fact.

This mother knows how to tell a story.

Plot

With his wife's disappearance having become the focus of an intense media circus, a man sees the spotlight turned on him when it's suspected that he may not be innocent.
There's SOOOOOOO much to love about this film. I just wish I could write about it. What I will do is dive into what Fincher and company did that made this film one of his worth watching collection. The first thing this film has going for it is it's stellar cast. Gone Girl is LOADED with talented people.

Including Tyler Perry.
I know he's not everyone's cup of tea and after his dreadful performance in the equally dreadful Alex Cross, Perry seemed like a dubious choice to be among some pretty major heavyweights in the biz. The difference in performance from Alex Cross to Gone Girl stems from two very important factors. The first being the story. Secondly and more importantly is David Fincher. Perry worked with Rob Cohen on Alex Cross. That guy can't direct traffic let alone a film. Fincher is in a completely different league and level so the performance will match both Fincher's ability and vision for the work.
Of course we all know that this film is carried by it's leads. Bruce Wayn.....I mean Ben Affleck and Rosamund Pike. These two are just tremendous together in every moment. The film plays out in a linear/non linear fashion so as the story progresses you can judge for yourself who to root for if at all. An argument can be made that Affleck "coasted" through this film and that his performance wasn't much to write home about. I buy that for a dollar with one little caveat. I truly feel that Fincher wanted to take Affleck/Nick Dunne down this road in order to keep us on the hook before what happens in Act 2.
The thing that must be remembered about this film is that it's a slow burn. A very sloooooooow burn. This comes off through both Pike's and Affleck's performances. As the film jumps back and forth from parts of their lives we get more glimpses of where this film is going and if you're really paying attention you'll spot some subtle hints that may lead you down the rabbit hole of this mystery. If you did then bravo for you because I consider myself as someone who catches stuff pretty quickly and I was drawn into where this story was going. A lot of that is a direct result of how well crafted the narrative was paced. The film plays in three distinctive parts that revolve around our husband and wife duo.

I would love to delve into how they play out but it would completely ruin everything.

Fincher does a great job playing out the mystery and plays with the audience as we try to Sherlock Holmes the plot.

This is both a strength and weakness.
As the story moves along beat by beat the motives of each character further unravel and then POW! you are tossed into a different world. I won't say when or how but experiencing the changeover was very fun to watch and it put this film in a new territory. The weakness part of this is that doing this properly takes time to develop and mature. The trade off is an expanded run time. Gone Girl is too long, it could have used a trim of about 10-15 minutes. This is a typical trend for a David Fincher film. He makes long films and the majority of them are thoroughly entertaining. However not even he can escape the dreaded lagging spots. The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo suffered from that and Gone Girl unfortunately does as well.
Run time aside, Gone Girl has plenty more going for it. In addition to the cast, director and thrilling story, the film has the time to make a social commentary on the media and how disruptive and influential they can be in times of current events. As Nick continues his search for Amy the press do what they do best which is cover the story they WANT not the one that's actually THERE! The media's presence in this film was so crucial that it can almost be called a character. The exposure and use of the media played a crucial role in the motives of everyone affected by Amy's disappearance. It was a subtle and at times not so subtle jab at how despicable the press can be and have been when dealing with other people's misery.

That's as spoilery as I'm going to get.
All told, Gone Girl was a terrific mystery thriller that was handled by the right guy. I'm sure that there are many other directors that could have handled this adaptation and done a great job. Darren Aaronofsky and Steve McQueen are two names that immediately pop in my head. Having said that, Fincher has a knack for getting every last ounce of drama and tension in a film that's loaded with it. Gone Girl may not float everyone's boat but it's worth your time if your in the mood to get "lost" in a whodunnit story.

Get the "lost" joke? My cheesy pun for the day.

On that note it's on the score.

On the 5 star scale. Gone Girl gets 4 stars with a "Worth Every Penny!" recommendation.

That's a wrap for today.

Until Next Episode...."I'll Save You A Seat!"

"D"

Boyhood

Welcome to another episode of Lights....Camera....Popcorn!

Today's review is Boyhood.

Written & Directed by Richard Linklater.

Review #258

MPAA Rating: Rated R for language including sexual references, and for teen drug and alcohol use.

Run Time: 165 min

Hulk Spoils Hollywood Podcast Page

Cast

Ellar Coltrane...Mason

Patricia Arquette...Mom

Ethan Hawke...Dad

Lorelei Linklater...Samantha


Making movies is at times a painstaking process. So much goes into a production that directors literally spend years putting their passion on screen. It takes an amazing amount of attention to detail and dedication. With the way studios breathe down director's necks it's amazing that films get made at all. Knowing all of this now take into consideration the amount of attention and dedication that's needed to make a film that took 12 years to film.

That's how long it took to make Boyhood and there's no question....It was WORTH THE WAIT!
Plot

The life of a young man, Mason, from age 5 to age 18.

Now before I begin I want to put to rest a "friendly" debate I had with someone who dared to categorize my praise of this film a faint because it wasn't the first film to take this long to make. Anyone and I do mean ANYONE that challenges this film with Avatar as an example of an exhaustive, time consuming production needs to be educated and QUICKLY! 

I do concede that Avatar is a labor of love for James Cameron. HOWEVER! There's NO WAY on god's green earth that overrated cartoon can be put in this film's class. Did it take Cameron a better part of 15 years to make? Absolutely, and what did he do with that time? He made The Last of The Mohicans in outer space filled with computer generated characters that exhibited more life that the LIVING cast.

Boyhood goes so far beyond the concept of "taking your time" that it toes the line between a scripted film and documentary. In fact this film can be properly classified as a docudrama.
To follow the growth and maturity of a child from age 5 to 18 is an ambitious undertaking that requires a lot of attention to continuity. A lot has to go right for this project to be pulled off and for Linklater, things appeared to have gone well. It helped that he was surrounded by some pretty strong actors. Ethan Hawke and Patricia Aquette headline the group of adults that form around the lives of Mason and his sister Samantha. The film chronicles the strained and distant relationship between dad and mom as she tries to raise two kids on her own. Mom does all the heavy lifting and dad swoops in and unconditionally receives the kids love because he's the absentee parent. As I was watching this film I began to wonder if this scenario was going to play out throughout the whole film.

Then this scene happened that changed everything.
The scene pictured looks pretty harmless right? For the most part it was. Dad spending some quality time knocking down some pins with the kids. Then comes a life lesson moment that turned this film into something more important than just a presentation of watching a boy grow up. At one point Mason complains that he bowled better when the bumpers were up on the lane. Dad explains to him that bumpers are cheating and that it's much more rewarding to roll a strike without them. Trust me, as a bowler for over 25 years I know. Mason continues to sulk and looks like he wants to give up on the game when dad gets frustrated and tells him.....(I'm paraphrasing here) "Life doesn't give you bumpers, you have to learn to do things on your own." His point was that just because bowling seemed easier the last time he used the bumpers that now he has to adjust without them. Which is a perfect metaphor for life.

That small line turned this film into a true coming of age story for Mason.
Boyhood does more than just follow the growth of Mason. It chronicles the growth of everyone around him. From his mom, dad to his sister as well. This film has garnered critic acclaim for Ellar Coltrane's performance as Mason and rightfully so. However there is a player in this film that deserves just as much credit and possibly more.

Her name is Lorelei Linklater as Samantha.
From the first moment she steps on screen doing a hysterical impression of Britney Spears to annoy Mason, Samantha goes toe to toe with Mason at every turn. Linklater's performance is just as compelling. Not just because we saw her grow up at the same time as Mason. It's because she plays off him the way an older sibling would in any family structure. Then in certain moments Linklater gets to shine by acting exactly how a young girl should. Bratty, annoying, disrespectful, selfish, all the things that teenage girls are when they think they know everything. This comes out masterfully by Linklater and ramps up the drama and intrigue of this film one hundred fold. Linklater provides so much balance between her and Mason that you could make a strong case for this film to change it's title from Boyhood to Childhood.
Several things happen to Mason, Sam and Mom that shape the course of their lives and as Mason continued to age he began to develop a very annoying personality. It was very lackadaisical, not a care in the world mindset that really got to me. I was on his side for most of this film until he hit high school and started this attitude and then it hit me like a ton of bricks. How can a boy learn to be a man when there isn't one around to guide him. The father figures that he collected along the way were people you didn't want him to emulate and his real father was Persona Non Grata for most of his adolescent life. I should have caught this sooner but I was so annoyed by Mason's demeanor that it blinded me to the reality of his situation.

This speaks highly of Coltrane's performance.
As the film draws to it's close, Mason begins to find his footing and shed his s**t on life attitude and when he gets to college you finally see where his head is at and where he could be going. It was the perfect point in his life to finish this journey and it ended at the most pitch perfect moment.
Here, Mason is hanging out with some friends he just met at school and this conversation he has with this girl was poignant. The girl asks him about the saying "seize the moment" and how it's the other way around that the moment seizes them.

College freshman shouldn't be this deep.

The point is that Mason in his mind has finally found someone that shares similar mindsets and philosophies. The bond they begin to build is clear as day and just like that....

Cut to black.

Brilliant closure point for a film that pushes the envelop at almost 3 hours. Having said that, Boyhood doesn't play like that. It's as similar as Blue Is the Warmest Color. Read review HERE. Boyhood isn't as erotically or emotionally charged as Blue is but the film does have a parallel in that both leads explore their maturity and adulthood over a period of time.

Regardless, Boyhood is a cinematic achievement that requires your viewing. Take the time to witness the journey of a boy to man story.

It's worth it.

On the 5 star scale. Boyhood gets 4 stars with a "Worth Every Penny!" recommendation.

That's a wrap for today.

Until Next Episode...."I'll Save You A Seat!"

"D"

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles

Welcome to another episode of Lights....Camera....Popcorn!

Today's review is Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.

Directed by Jonathan Liebesman.

Written by Josh Applebaum, Andre Nemec & Evan Daughtery.

Based on the "Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles" characters created by Kevin Eastman & Peter Laird.

Review #257

MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for sci-fi action violence.

Run Time: 101 min

Hulk Spoils Hollywood Podcast Page

Cast

Megan Fox...April O'Neil

Will Arnett...Vernon Fenwick

William Fichtner...Eric Sacks

Alan Ritchson...Raphael

Noel Fisher...Michelangelo

Pete Ploszek...Leonardo

Johnny Knoxville...Leonardo (voice)

Jeremy Howard...Donatello

Danny Woodburn...Splinter

Tony Shalhoub...Splinter (voice)

Tohoru Masamune...Shredder

Whoopi Goldberg...Bernadette Thompson


Michael Bay.

The name makes my skin turn green. This hack has been responsible for some reprehensible films. Pearl Harbor, Bad Boys II and let's not forget the Transformers series. My biggest problem with Bay's films is his incessant need to inject street humor into scenes that don't need or want them. He tries to be "down" when in reality he's distancing himself from serious movie goers. Need proof? No problem.

Take a look at this picture.
Those two robots were in Transformers: Revenge of the fallen. Click HERE to read review. They spent the entire film spouting out dated hip hop jargon and references that made no sense for any character to say let alone a transforming alien robot. Bay took it even further by giving the green one buck teeth with a gold cap on the right tooth.

Are you F***KING KIDDING ME!

So fast forward several years later.

Now that he's eviscerated any fond memories geeks my age had watching the Transformers. Bay and his production house Platinum Dunes have set their sights on another popular franchise that unlike Transformers had already made it to the silver screen.

The Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.

For the record. I made it clear to anyone who asked that I was not going to see this film. Then movie boredom set in and I had the good fortune of having a movie gift card on hand so I figured why not. It's a free film and who knows maybe I'll be surprised.

The final verdict is this. It's not bad but it's not good either.

Plot
A group of mutated warriors face off against an evil kingpin who wants to take over New York.
The first thing you have to know about this movie is aside from everyone questioning why it's being made but then again, that's the same attitude reboots/remakes always get. There were a flurry of rumors that teased the turtles weren't turtles at all. Instead they were going to be aliens. This sent the geek word into a frenzy. The vitriol was so hot that almost everyone involved with the production had to go public with a comment denouncing the rumor. My personal opinion is that the film was always going to go in the alien direction and was forced to switch things up after the torrential backlash the production was getting. This is probably why the film was also delayed as long as it was. I'm sure some hefty rewrites were needed to get the script in line which begs the question, if they had to go back to the drawing board....

Why was the script so hollow?
The biggest problem with the script is revolving the story around April O'neil. Why is that a problem? Just look at the picture. Need I say more? Megan Fox is an ATROCIOUS actress that has no business being in any films. Her brainless, wandering "performance" just kills any momentum this film has and there wasn't much of it. The idea of making April the focal point of the story wasn't bad. The gross error in judgement was who was cast to play her. The next problem is the lack of depth and explanation of the foot clan. The film begins with some exposition about how the foot clan are terrorizing the city and nobody can stop them. This is exactly similar to the original film with the exception that the police were at least present. Not once do you see a cop or any type of law enforcement when the foot attacks. The script has more problems so no need to get into them. I'll dive into the one thing that I did enjoy from this film and that's

The Turtles.
If there was one thing these guys got right it was the stars of the show. The character designs were over complicated but what else do you expect from a Michael Bay influenced film. What the producers got right were the personality traits of the ninja four. Leonardo was the stoic "leader" voice by Johnny Knoxville another miscasting. Michelangelo was the ever present wise ass that occasionally tossed out some pretty funny one liners. Raphael who was the show stealer was the tough guy who has a chip on his shoulder and Donatello was the brain who had the least amount of dialogue and things to do. Not sure why the balance was off but when the four of them were together either in cahoots or combat they were the turtles I fell in love with a long time ago.
Another character that I felt they nailed was The Shredder. His backstory was clouded non explanation but his look and fighting prowess was an serious upgrade from the previous films version of the villain. A very nice introductory scene showcases this very well executed change. You truly felt that this guy was a force to be reckoned with and was going to be a tough challenge for the Turtles. Again, his design was a bit over complicated. It's tough to believe that Shredder would feel any pain from a punch or kick covered in all that armor. The suit also rendered the turtles weapons moot since Leo's katana's, Raph's sai's, Mikey's nunchucks and Donny's bo staff were never going to penetrate that metal. This made the final fight less enjoyable. There was an opportunity to showcase some impressive martial arts and instead we were treated to the same shaky cam, over sped, frenetic sequences that waste any integrity the stunt team had in putting together the fights in the first place.

I was able to get past it because I know what great martial arts films look like and I knew going into this one that I wasn't going to get it.

That would have been a tremendous bonus.
Bottom line is Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles will not give you that nostalgic feeling from yesteryear. This is a blatant update to try to appeal to an audience that weren't around when the turtles first spent their nights leaping off rooftops stopping crime in the comics. Unfortunately with these audience driven reboots, storytelling is replaced with stupidity and ADHD pacing so what you get is a video game. With a sequel already announced the franchise will continue to churn out more spectacles. Hopefully a better writing team can come in and fill in the many blanks this film left behind.

I'm not betting on it but one can hope right?

On the 5 star scale. Teenage Ninja Turtles gets 1.5 stars with a "Netflix It!" recommendation.

That's a wrap for today.

Until Next Episode...."I'll Save You A Seat!"

"D"

Guardians of The Galaxy

Welcome to another episode of Lights....Camera....Popcorn!

Today's review is Guardians of The Galaxy.

Directed by James Gunn.

Written by James Gunn & Nicole Perlman.

Based on the Marvel comics "Guardians of The Galaxy" created by Dan Abnett & Andy Lanning.

Review #256

MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for intense sequences of sci-fi violence and action, and for some language.

Run Time: 121 min

Hulk Spoils Hollywood Podcast Page

Cast

Chris Pratt...Peter Quill

Zoe Saldana...Gamora

Dave Bautista...Drax

Vin Diesel...Groot (voice)

Bradley Cooper...Rocket (voice)

Lee Pace...Ronan

Michael Rooker...Yondu Udonta

Karen Gillan...Nebula

Djimon Hounsou...Korath

John C. Reilly...Corpsman Dey

Glenn Close...Nova Prime

Benicio Del Toro...The Collector


Marvel Studios has taken big time gambles with their comic properties. Starting with their Phase One set of films that eventually tied into The Avengers. Click to read review. Which is arguably the BEST Marvel film of the lot. The massive success of Phase One set the tone for Phase Two and Three.

Phase Two had the same cast of characters returning for sequels. Iron Man, Thor and Captain America. Then Marvel thought they would shake things up and bring the Guardians of The Galaxy to the silver screen. Then added to the long shot was the choice of director James Gunn to helm the project. The geek world (myself included) was intrigued with both choices. After seeing this film I learned a very valuable lesson.

Don't bet against Marvel Studios.

Plot

Light years from Earth, 26 years after being abducted, Peter Quill finds himself the prime target of a manhunt after discovering an orb wanted by Ronan the Accuser.
The first thing to understand and appreciate about this film is the big brass balls Marvel Studious has to even make it. Anyone who walked around saying they were excited about this film when it was announced is LYING! Why? Because NOBODY knew who the Guardians of The Galaxy were. The most recognizable character was a talking raccoon with a gun. It was very hard to take this film seriously once introduced to the eclectic cast of characters this team was comprised of. Then Marvel did something very clever. They incorporated these rag tag band of misfits into their shared universe and suddenly this made things more interesting.
I openly admit that I knew nothing about this group. So what does a legit geek do? Homework. Like most of my reviews, I researched info about the film I'm writing about. This time I did my digging before I saw the film to get a better sense of what I was about to deal with. This is where parts of my passion for movies collided. In doing my background check on The Guardians the first teaser trailer came out. The one that set off a fire storm of iTunes downloads of the song "Hooked on a Feeling" by Blue Swede. It was a well cut montage mixed with the Ooga Chaka Ooga Ooga Ooga Chaka hook that starts the song.

Here's the (trailer) if you feel nostalgic.

It's worth a look.
In that trailer, the tone of the movie was set. At first viewing I was not on board. I thought that if a movie like this was going to succeed, a movie with characters that nobody knew about, the comedy would have to be reigned in. Shows how much I know. If that happened then this film would have SUCKED! The biggest aspect this film presents to us is a team of heroes made up of a group that has no business banding together. The Guardians are the anti Avengers. Every character has their own singular focus that never merges with the others so in order to make this "team" work together the script needed a fair amount of levity and sarcasm. It makes sense considering that 2 of the 5 Guardians are clowns. Peter Quill and....

Rocket.
Going into this movie I had a similar feeling for Rocket that I had for another Marvel character making his debut in a film. You might know him. A small character named Wolverine. When X-Men was released back in 2000 the geek world waited with baited breath to see how one of the most popular characters in comics would be portrayed on film. My opinion still remains that the entire X-Men franchise hinged on Hugh Jackman's performance. Lucky for Bryan Singer and 20th Century Fox the Aussie NAILED it and now the Clawed Canadian has become arguably the greatest Marvel character to appear on screen.
My point is that even though very few people know who The Guardians are, this film hinged on Rocket and Bradley Cooper's performance behind the mic. What ended up happening was a terrific blend of CGI, voice acting and a believable feeling that this was not a cartoon character running around with the rest of the group. There's no question that Rocket was the funniest character in the film but his comedic timing was only bested by his toughness. You were forced to take him seriously despite his diminutive stature. He was not a side show freak which is saying a lot considering all of the Guardians can be considered side show freaks. That's what in my opinion made this film so good. These guys are a bunch of misfits that would rather tear each other apart let alone work together for selfless pursuits. It was a fresh way to present a cast of characters that are worth rooting for and knowing more about. All this being said. Guardians of The Galaxy isn't perfect, and the biggest failure rests with this man.

Ronan the Accuser. 
This is the main antagonist and not once do you fear him or wonder if he can defeat the Guardians. This has become a trend in recent Marvel films where the villain doesn't have as much stock or purpose in the film as he should. Particularly Thor: The Dark World. Click HERE to read review. Now we all know that these films are like Pro Wrestling. The outcome is predetermined before you buy your ticket. No studio has the balls to break the formula and have the bad guy win before the end credits roll. As a result the villains in these films are served as plot devices rather than true adversaries. What hurts Ronan further in this film is that the majority of the time is spent setting up the Guardians and getting to know them. Rightfully so but there's got to be a better way to balance the two. I wish I had an answer but it's a very tricky prospect.
You don't want to short change your heroes at the expense of a character that won't survive past the first film. However, how can you take the villain seriously when he gets a couple of cutaway scenes that quickly map out his dastardly deeds. Maybe if there was a scene or two that displayed Ronan's lack of mercy towards the Nova Prime planet or some show of random violence.

ANYTHING to get you to hate him.

It seemed that Gunn and company were more interested in reintroducing us to Thanos than giving Ronan the respect he deserves.
Thanos pictured above is name dropped a TON in this film and has a brief scene with Ronan so it's clear as day that his presence is going to be prevalent in many of the future Marvel films coming up. It's no secret that Thanos is projected to be the main villain in The Avengers 3 so setting him up now with the inclusion of more infinity stones is a good idea but it takes away what is more important for this film which was establishing Ronan as a force to be reckoned with.

That didn't happen.
The final word is simple.

Guardians of The Galaxy is a really good film and gets the cosmic arena of Marvel's library off to a great start. Is it the best Marvel movie ever made? No. Is it better than The Avengers? NOT EVEN CLOSE! Is it a film worth watching? ABSOLUTELY! James Gunn deserves a ton of credit for pulling off something that I thought only Joss Whedon could do. He made a terrific ensemble film filled with good action, well timed comedy and tightly written characters. Guardians of The Galaxy is a nice change of pace from the "grounded" world Marvel has given us. Taking the universe into literally the universe was the next logical move and it has paid off.

So far....

On the 5 star scale. Guardians of The Galaxy gets 4 stars with a "Worth Every Penny!" recommendation.

That's a wrap for today.

Until Next Episode...."I'll Save You A Seat!"

"D"