Interstellar

Welcome to another episode of Lights....Camera....Popcorn!

Today's review is Interstellar.

Directed by Christopher Nolan.

Written by Jonathan Nolan & Christopher Nolan.

Review #261

MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for some intense perilous action and brief strong language.

Run Time: 169 min

Hulk Spoils Hollywood Podcast Page

Cast

In order of apperance

Ellen Burstyn...Murph (older)

Matthew McConaughey...Cooper

Mackenzie Foy...Murph (10 Yrs.)

John Lithgow...Donald

Bill Irwin...TARS (voice)

Anne Hathaway...Brand

Wes Bentley...Doyle

Michael Caine...Professor Brand

David Gyasi...Romilly

Josh Stewart...CASE (voice)

Jessica Chastain...Murph


Topher Grace...Getty

Matt Damon...Dr. Mann


It's no secret that I am on Team Nolan. From the day he played with everyone's head with Memento I knew immediately that this was a man dedicated to making films.

Not movies. There is a difference.

Nolan's talent is only limited by his imagination and judging by his non Batman films, his imagination is limitless. That's not always a good thing and that is the case with this film.

Interstellar is by far Nolan's WORST film.

However, that doesn't mean it's bad.

Plot

A team of explorers travel through a wormhole in an attempt to find a potentially habitable planet that will sustain humanity.

Let me explain what I meant when I said Interstellar is Nolan's worst film. Nolan has such an expansive mind for stories that he can sometimes overload the audience with material that does more harm than good. With this film he knocks you over the head with a TON of science. Not necessarily a bad thing. Unless the science is way beyond the reach of anyone not named Neil deGrasse Tyson.

The basic plot is as straightforward as you can get.

It's when we venture out into space where Interstellar both succeeds and fails.
The "worlds" that the team explores are beautiful in a creepy way. They present the best chance of humanity's survival but don't appear on the "surface" as a livable habitat. The exploration scenes provide the film with the necessary action beats it needs to keep people on board after all the emotions that run through the main cast. At it's core, Interstellar is a save the world film but along the way Nolan does something very risky. He blends two very opposite and opposing forces.

Science vs Faith.
I don't mean faith in the religious sense. Nolan brings the "L" word into the equation. Love plays a immeasurable factor in the weight of this story. It's that inclusion that brings the heart of Interstellar to the forefront. The people on this mission are not just trying to save the world, they are trying to save their loved ones. It's a force more powerful than any weapon a person can wield. It can also cloud a person's judgement forcing bad decisions that affect others. Those dynamics come into play when it concerns our main man Coop and his daughter Murph. Their relationship is strong and when Coop leaves for the mission Murph shuns him. It's a moment that comes into play much later in the film when Coop looks at video messages from his family while out in space.
It's explained that after passing through the wormhole that time is no longer the same for them as it is for the people they left behind. So when Coop looks at an archive of messages he breaks down in total heartache watching the reality that he missed his children growing up. The scene is pictured above is one of the high points of the film. Even though it's depicting a very somber moment it was vital to remind us that these people have made the ultimate sacrifice and seeing the pain behind Coop's eyes was predictable but poignant.
When the film eventually reaches it's third act. At almost three hours it takes a while for that to happen. Interstellar plays another trick on everyone by forcing you to take a side revolving a very compelling argument. This argument creates an interesting dynamic between the characters making and an emotional divide that makes it very hard to choose. Nolan drags this out for all it's worth and cross cuts this with what's going on on a different part of the planet with the remaining astronauts.

It was a well crafted scene that was unfortunately lost under Hans Zimmer's overpowering score.
If I had to complain about a Nolan film, there would be 2 gripes. The first being his sound mixing. It's HORRIBLE. For someone who's as detailed as him it strikes me odd that his last string of films constantly have to fight with itself. Going back to his Dark Knight trilogy to Inception to here, these films have had blatant issues with sound and music. Nolan's dialogue gets garbled under blaring tones that make it impossible to discern. To make matters worse this happens at critical points of the film where story points are mapped out to guide us along. Once is a mistake, twice is noticeable, three or four times is just an unacceptable oversight that 1st year film students know not to do.
The second gripe is actually more important. Nolan had this problem with The Dark Knight Rises and Inception. He over stuffs his films with way too many subplots or overcomplicated scenarios. I can't believe I'm about to write this but he has a tendency to go Damon Lindelof on us. I know It's sacrilege to put Nolan and that wannabe hack in the same group but in this case it's unavoidable. Nolan goes Lindelof here and though he's able to save it at the end by tugging at our tickers it doesn't excuse the incredibly overdone climax that does more questioning that explaining. This is where I realized that this was Nolan's worst film. He couldn't kill his darlings. It's a tough proposition for filmmakers. They fall in love with their material and fight to keep stuff in that makes no sense or drags the story down. Nolan is guilty of that.

Both Nolan's are guilty of that.
His younger brother Jonathan co wrote the script and is the "crazier" of the pair. He loves to go "out" there and explore the deep reaches of the imagination and that exploration yields some "interesting" results. Not that they're bad, they're just uncontrolled. This is where big brother comes in and tries to reign things in. The combination works for the most part. This time it didn't because there was way too much out there to hold down.

Interstellar is not a bad movie. It's very good in some spots and in some spots it's great but there are places where it's not so great or good and that's unfortunately what I gravitated to.

No pun intended.

On the 5 star scale. Interstellar gets 2.5 stars with a "Go See It!" recommendation.

That's a wrap for today.

Until Next Episode...."I'll Save You A Seat!"

"D"

Birdman

Welcome to another episode of Lights....Camera....Popcorn!

Today's review is Birdman.

Directed by Alejandro González Iñárritu.

Written by Alejandro González Iñárritu, Nicolás Giacobone, Alexander Dinelaris & Armando Bo.

Review #260

MPAA Rating: Rated R for language throughout, some sexual content and brief violence.

Run Time: 119 min

Hulk Spoils Hollywood Podcast Page

Cast

Michael Keaton...Riggan

Emma Stone...Sam

Zach Galifianakis...Jake

Naomi Watts...Lesley

Jeremy Shamos...Ralph

Andrea Riseborough...Laura

Edward Norton...Mike


Lindsay Duncan...Tabitha

Meritt Weaver...Annie

Movies can do many things.

They can entertain.

Provide an escape from the harsh realities of life.

Remind us of what really matters to us all.

And finally they can inspire.

The immeasurable power that movies wield is what draws me to them and once in a blue moon a film finds a way to do all of the things I just described.

Ladies and Gentlemen I present to you....Birdman!
Plot

A washed-up actor who once played an iconic superhero must overcome his ego and family trouble as he mounts a Broadway play in a bid to reclaim his past glory.

This movie is so amazing that I don't know where to begin so I will do the obvious thing and start from the beginning.
The film begins with this scene and right at the outset you are trying to ascertain what you're seeing. Can Riggan actually fly? Does he think he can? or is Alejandro González Iñárritu just messing with us.

The answer is YES.

From this point on the film no pun intended takes off.
Going into this film I knew a couple of things like the basic synopsis and how this film was a pseudo commentary on Micheal Keaton's career after he donned the cape and cowl. The one thing I didn't know was how this film was going to play and how it plays was just remarkable and in my opinion the only way it would have worked. I want so badly to tell you what I mean but I refuse to take the surprise away from you.

You all deserve to witness it without any preconceived ideas.

So let's get into what I can talk about and I'll start with the Birdman himself.
I mentioned earlier that this film plays like a commentary about Keaton's career after Batman and a strong argument can be made that it is. After achieving massive success playing the superhero Birdman, Riggan has pigeon holed himself into being known as only Birdman. So Riggan's motivation is to take flight and resurrect his career like a phoenix rising from the ashes in a stage play that he adapts, stars and directs.

Sorry for all the bird puns. I couldn't resist.

As the movie progresses you follow Riggan as he juggles all of the responsibilities a director has and you begin to feel overwhelmed as he is. This guy is under a tremendous amount of pressure and Iñárritu does a wonderful job of letting us feel that pressure as Riggan takes his last shot at career revival.

This is just one of several commentaries this film makes about the entertainment industry that I LOVED with every beat of my heart.
The first one is the reality that no matter how big a star you are, eventually the spotlight will move on to someone else. This isn't exactly what happens to Riggan. He's more concerned with giving the audience another side of himself after "selling out" to play Birdman three times in major motion pictures.

Does this sound familiar? It should.

How many times have we heard about actors playing in major blockbuster films, make a ton of money then go behind it's back and trash it because they are "artists" and believe in the "purity" of the acting craft. No matter how hard he tries, Riggan can't escape the bird's shadow. When he's out on the street he's hounded by fans for autographs. He'll be standing outside his theater with his name and picture on the marquee and the people still call him Birdman. He does press to promote the play and when he mentions that doing the play was one of the reasons why he turned down making Birdman 4 one of the foreign reporters goes nuts asking him if he will do it. This frustrates Riggan to no end and begins to complain about it but is called out by his daughter played by Emma Stone.
This scene was brilliantly written and performed by Stone. She rips her dad down off his high horse while sending a message to all the egotistical Tinseltown turncoats that have no problem taking the check to play super whoever only to turn around and bad mouth everything about the film after it's out. It was refreshing to hear someone give Hollywood a reality check when it comes to the hypocrisy the business is notorious for.

But wait....There's more.
The other commentaries this film makes revolve around one spectacular scene involving Riggan and a New York Times theater critic played by Lindsay Duncan. The fate of the play rests on her review and she makes it plain as day that her review will destroy Riggan's chance of any success. The back and forth between the critic and the performer was remarkable. Both sides made valid points worth considering. It was hard to take a side because when the critic pontificates about the S.O.S method of films today and how everyone spends their time “measuring out your worth in weekends.” You understand where she comes from. The first thing Tabitha says to Riggan is "I'm going to kill your play." Then proceeds to call him a "Hollywood clown in a lycra bird suit." Brutal stuff but Birdman fights back. Riggan responds with the logic of how irresponsible and petty it is for a critic to form an opinion on someone's work without seeing it first.

The scene was amazing and for me one of the highlights of a film that was chock full of them.
Speaking of highlights. It's time to talk about how incredible Michael Keaton is. He turns in an Oscar worthy performance that hasn't been seen from him in ages. He injects so much of his career exploits from past and present into this character that you might have been better off calling him Michael instead of Riggan. Plus the Birdman and Batman DNA is way too tongue in cheek to not ignore.
Keaton does a bit of everything with Riggan. You get the stressed out, under the gun, against the clock aging actor who may have bit off more than he can chew with his play. You get the soulful man with heart and emotions. Then you get the fun Riggan which was the zany, out of his head former super hero who still hears Birdman talking to him.
Keaton doesn't have to steal the show because he is the show but the man pictured to the right gives a valiant effort to clip the Birdman's wings. Edward Norton has had a fall from Hollywood grace after some box office flops and over inflated ego clashes with the powers that be in the biz. To see him comeback and comeback strong was a pleasure to witness. Norton is a really good actor and the material he's given here puts him back on the level he once shared with the elite. A lot of this has to do with Iñárritu's direction and the stunning script but the performance still has to materialize and man does it ever.
This film is an achievement on so many levels that it's gonna get SERIOUS contention for some Hollywood hardware. The only thing that can possibly stop or slow down The Birdman is every film's arch enemy....The calendar. This film might have been better served if it was released around Christmas time when all the other Oscar contenders get released. The other side to that argument is Birdman is ahead of the competition because it came out first. Very valid point but in situations like this I'm reminded of something Charles Barkley once said. "The only person that's undefeated in sports is Father Time." Meaning that the more time passes as more Oscar films come out, will Birdman get lost in the flock? Highly unlikely. I'm just concerned that the power this film carries will be weakened by it coming out in October.

One thing remains clear.

Birdman is a tremendous film that requires your money and attention. A must see!

On the 5 star scale. Birdman gets the full house. 5 stars with a "Worth Every Penny!" recommendation.

That's a wrap for today!

Until Next Episode...."I'll Save You A Seat!"

"D"